As of September 1st, 2009 several laws regarding concealed handgun licenses go into effect. One of these changes eliminates the penalty for failing to show a licensee’s CHL to a police officer when identification is requested.
The Houston Comical has a story about this:
A small change in concealed handgun laws has created safety concerns among Houston police officers who work the streets.
The new law removes the penalty for failing to show a police officer a concealed handgun license (CHL) when stopped by an officer who asks for identification. The law went into effect Sept. 1. Previously, if a person was carrying a hidden weapon and failed to present the CHL, they could lose the license for one year.
Houston police officers suggested that licensed handgun holders continue to show their credentials, even if not required to by the law. It will defuse any potential problems or miscommunications, they said.
In response to the article:
Yes, the penalty is removed but CHL holders still have a legal requirement to show their ‘other’ license if a police officer requests their ID.
I have spoken personally with a Texas Highway Patrol officer regarding this (at night on the side of a road, actually). He told me that the annotation to your ‘file’ when pulled up on his computer simply places an asterisk next to your name. The asterisk notation is used to indicate that more information on the person exists. Unfortunately, the asterisk is not only used to identify CHL holders, but people with outstanding warrants too.
Somewhat of a conflict, right? It’s hard to fault an officer for having a gut defensive reaction to seeing that ‘*‘ next to a name. They do come in contact with the worst of our society very regularly and the cops want to go home safe every night. How would you react if something flagged the person you are about to have contact with is either one of the safest people in town or one of the most dangerous?
With that in mind, I suggest that when complying with the requirement to inform the officer of your CHL, you include this specific verbiage: “I have a permit.”
Do not say: “I have a gun.”
It’s just good manners.
Filed under: Gun News | Tagged: CHL, law change, Sept 1 2009, showing ID, Texas |
1 With A Bullet 
A Burnet, Texas Police Officer pulled up behind me in a Wagreens parking lot. The officer said someone had reported the “several kids” were hanging out of my truck…They were not…Cop then asked for my ID and ins. & ran checks local and all he could on me…so I didnt care for his attitude so I did not mention my CHL or the fact that I was carrying at the time…the license check showed no warrents but identified me as a CHL holder. The cop asked why I didnt tell him and i said there is no legal requirement for me to do so. He said well its a a curtosy..I just told him that curtosy is a two way street.
just because the officer had a bad day being more nicer would have him think about the way he had treated you and the next time he may not have a attitude.
Police officers are servants of the people. SERVANTS, not the masters.
Respect must be earned. Some average Joe who grew up in the trailer park does not automatically deserve respect just because he dons a government uniform.
If an officer is being nice, be nice back.
If an officer is being a complete asshole… Well…
Obey the law, but stand up for your rights.
If we all just did what government officials wanted us to when they wanted it, we’d all be saying “Sieg heil!” or “Внимание!” right about now.
I agree with Heinrich. nuf said.